| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Womance article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 12 February 2015 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of Womance be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Okay but why not flo-mance? Womance doesn’t have a ring to it at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jjanney08 (talk • contribs) 04:24, 4 April 2023 (UTC)
Notability
editFlash in the pan. A tiny bit of usage, briefly, but this WP:NEO did not make the cut. WP:NOTDICTIONARY.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:34, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
- After being accused of "drive-by tagging," I return to detail my searches. JSTOR had three hits, all transcription errors. (e.g.: this 1939 article It falls into the class to which belong Dmitri WIerejkowski's Womance of leonardo da Vtnci and Rachel Annand Taylor's leonardo tfie Florentine presumably mechanicallly transcribed from a printed journal.") More to the point, is WP:NEO which reads: "To support an article about a particular term or concept, we must cite what reliable secondary sources, such as books and papers, say about the term or concept, not books and papers that use the term." If we are to keep this article, that sort of source needs to be cited in the article.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:23, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
- Female bonding is a plausible target for a merge.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:28, 24 January 2017 (UTC)
it is about female Platonism. what is so great about that? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.213.14.116 (talk) 16:13, 23 August 2017 (UTC)