Talk:Wipeout (elections)
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editI disagree strongly with the current text of the last section, "Voting systems to reduce wipe-out results", which currently contains this line: "The first change is to convert FPTP into some other system, IRV is best, but you can try LimV, AppV. With voting machines, one might even allow the voter to choose which system to use, because you can convert LimV and AppV to IRV." It is laughable to say that "IRV is best" so easily, with no explanation. - McCart42 (talk) 04:33, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
- For the record, that stuff had sat there basically untouched for nearly 2 years: [1] 68.39.174.238 03:52, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
Mongolia
editWasn't sure how and whether this needed citing, but to be safe: here's a link (2000) and here's another (1996)
Requested move 27 June 2024
edit
 | It has been proposed in this section that Wipeout (elections) be renamed and moved to Electoral wipeout. A bot will list this discussion on requested moves' current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Wipeout (elections) → Electoral wipeout – per WP:NATURAL HadesTTW (he/him • talk) 16:04, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Rename per nom. * Pppery * it has begun... 19:45, 27 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Sensible proposal. Number 57 02:16, 29 June 2024 (UTC)