Talk:William St Clair

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Claire 75 in topic Multiple issues

Multiple issues

edit

These arise from the issue of the page's genesis. They include that it's not WP:NPOV, it's written like a list , and has unsourced info (i.e., the insertion of a curriculum vitae).

The subject appears to meet Wikipedia notability criteria and some sources are verifiable so I've not recommended it for deletion. It has not however been edited other than minor copy edits, categories and bots since its creation so this is also an option.

--Claire 75 (talk) 08:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

Blatant self-promotion by the subject

edit

The style of this biography reads like a PR piece and I discover that it was created in 2010 by an account bearing the same name as someone apparently employed as the subject's research assistant - see https://uk.linkedin.com/in/georgina-hill-91103634. The original editor's Wikipedia account has not been used since 2010. The William St Clair article has not been substantively edited since its creation.

The subject may be sufficiently notable not to have his page deleted, but unsurprisingly needs a lot of work to make it fit for Wikipedia, which I don't have the time (or frankly, given its genesis, the inclination) to do. So I will flag various of the problems (once I work out how you do that). Claire 75 (talk) 08:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on William St Clair. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 19:19, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply