Talk:William Courtenay, 9th Earl of Devon

Default sort question edit

Why is this sorted by "Devon" instead of "Courtenay"? Jason Quinn (talk) 13:03, 2 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

I changed it to "Courtenay". Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
I changed it back; see WP:PEERS: we sort by name of peerage, then common name.
James F. (talk) 13:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

Relationship with Beckford edit

It seems that both Courtenay and Beckford worked extensively with architect James Wyatt if the unsourced information on this Wikipedia article is correct. Does anyone have sources about Courtenay's commission to Wyatt? Blue Rasberry (talk) 14:35, 2 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

imprecise term? edit

As "homosexual affair" is anachronistic anyways, and implies consent, is there a better way of terming the relationship? Courtenay was a child when it began and was beaten when the relationship was disclosed. In modern terms we would call this abuse. I'm not trying to make a political point, but "affair" has its own connotations. Wickedjacob (talk) 03:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

The relationship lasted six years, so consent was surely implicit here. The relationship was disclosed by a third party witnessing the beating incident, when the boy was sixteen and obviously already homosexual, and Beckford, a self professed pederast. The monochrome print image in the article, titled: 'William "Kitty" Courtenay, 9th Earl of Devon, in boyhood', is in fact of Beckford as a boy, and not Courtenay.

 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.196.245.137 (talk) 11:56, 23 October 2017 (UTC)Reply 

"The relationship lasted six years, so consent was surely implicit here." from 10 to 16? the power differential between an adult and a child means consent is in no way implicit. Otherwise you are arguing nothing is ever abuse if it continues for years.

"he monochrome print image in the article, titled: 'William "Kitty" Courtenay, 9th Earl of Devon, in boyhood', is in fact of Beckford as a boy, and not Courtenay." also wrong.

Wickedjacob (talk) 18:34, 21 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Source for age when meeting William Beckford edit

If the National Trust for Scotland is credible, then it could be that they met when Courtenay was eleven, not ten. Here is the link to the article; https://www.nts.org.uk/stories/william-beckford-1760-1844-part-one I'm not sure if this is good enough to cite, but it seems good enough as there's no citation for it right now. Gurblet (talk) 02:28, 4 October 2023 (UTC)Reply