This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject United KingdomUnited Kingdom articles
Watson-class lifeboat is within the scope of the WikiProject Water sports, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Water sports. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.Water sportsWikipedia:WikiProject Water sportsTemplate:WikiProject Water sportsWater sports articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
I have been pondering the same thing myself while I have been expanding and editing the page. It would mean that all the pages that were created by @Ambak51: for the different lengths would need to be merged back into the new motor lifeboats page.
It doesn't seem to make sense that this page should have two of the lists but readers have to go elsewhere to find the details of others. If I want to find out a bout Watson-class RNLB Charles Henry Ashley, which page do I go to?.
If there really is a need to split the motor lifeboats into smaller pages then I think we should take a step back and consider how the different designs relate. Is it that there are just three, each produced with two or more lengths?
"Lets split that off, and then we can review whats left." What will be left is pretty much what was on the page a month ago — an unsourced history, two tables, and half a dozen short sections linked to the other pages.
I'm still not convinced that it needs to be split into so many pages. WP:SPLIT gives an idea of article length but I don't think it would reach too large a size even if all the motor lifeboats were merged. The prose on the current page is about 750 words, and each of the other pages would add perhaps 250 or 500 once the repetition is edited out. So the total is well short of the 8,000 guide for when a page needs to be split. The guidance suggests that lists should be treated differently and not split across pages if this can be avoided.
But if we do split off the pulling and sailing lifeboats that I have been working on, the title must be 'Watson-class pulling and sailing lifeboat' to comply with the policy of no acronyms in titles. Geof Sheppard (talk) 16:50, 22 June 2024 (UTC)Reply