Talk:WISE 1541−2250

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: page moved. Noting that the original mover was notified of this discussion two weeks ago [1], and has returned to editing since. DrKiernan (talk) 20:53, 16 November 2012 (UTC)

---

WISEPA J154151.66-225025.2 → WISE 1541-2250 – I propose moving the article back to this shorter name. User:Chermundy recently moved many similar articles with the rationale "full designation", but I think the shorter names make much more sense: the project scientists use the abbreviation to refer to this object in scientific literature, the names are still unambiguous, and the full designation is unwiedly and all the articles I checked use the abbreviation in the article body for this reason. The full designation includes more precision on the location of the star, but this information is already in sufficient detail in the observation data of the article and no one can remember all those digits. Hekerui (talk) 13:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Possible more accurate distance

If this paper is talking about the same thing (slightly different coordinates but unless there is a very close brown dwarf with the same discovery history it is the same thing) then there is a more accurate distance calculation available at the preprint stage:

https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.09181

©Geni (talk) 13:54, 1 October 2018 (UTC)