Talk:Vicki Miles-LaGrange
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Bot-created subpage
editA temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Vicki Miles-LaGrange was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 15:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
- Previously done.--TommyBoy (talk) 15:19, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
Libellous and inaccurate content regarding Judge Miles-LaGrange's knowledge of the Supremacy Clause
editA previous contributor had added this partisan and potentially libellous commentary on Judge Miles-LaGrange:
"However, she is unfamiliar with the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2: “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby, anything in the constitution or laws of any state to the contrary notwithstanding," and has ruled that the imposition of Islamic Sharia law on American citizens on American soil is constitutional."
This is both a partisan political attack and simply wrong. First, although Judge Miles-Lagrange's preliminary order is controversial, it does not betray ignorance of the Supremacy Clause. That characterization of her ruling amounts to an allegation of professional incompetence. Second, the quoted language is simply wrong. I say this as a professor of constitutional law who makes his living teaching constitutional law. If I were to make her preliminary order the object of an exam question and a student were to simply state in conclusory fashion that her ruling shows a lack of familiarity with the Supremacy Clause, that student would merit a failing grade.
I have replaced the libellous partisan political attack with references to (1) the actual ruling, so that people may see the legal basis for her ruling and judge it for themselves, and (2) a cite to academic coverage of a resolution introduced by an Oklahoma state legislator calling for her impeachment, which conveys the fact that the ruling has attracted some criticism but does so in a strictly factual manner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Davismaximus (talk • contribs) 09:00, 4 February 2011 (UTC)
Honorable Viki Miles Lagrange
editWould like to know about Ms. Lagrange. 2600:8803:F100:28B0:F159:A5A4:4C22:C4B0 (talk) 02:28, 16 January 2024 (UTC)