Talk:Verbatim (brand)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Sphilbrick in topic Location of founding

Fair use rationale for Image:Verbatim logo.jpg edit

 

Image:Verbatim logo.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 02:37, 12 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Merge Verbatim (UK) edit

Is Verbatim Corporation essentially the parent company of Verbatim UK? If so, these articles should be merged. Ubcule (talk) 12:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Location of founding edit

The main text says that information terminals Corporation was first started in Mountain View California, while the INFOBOX identifies the founding location is North Carolina United States.

My guess is that it is currently headquartered in North Carolina but was started in Mountain View California, but that's just a guess. Could someone identify a reliable source discussing the history and either make the change or drop me a ping so I can make the change?--S Philbrick(Talk) 17:20, 22 April 2019 (UTC)Reply