Talk:Ventidius Cumanus

Latest comment: 17 years ago by Homestarmy in topic GA review comments
Good articleVentidius Cumanus has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 28, 2007Good article nomineeListed
August 11, 2009Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article

GA review comments

edit

Well, since the person who reviewed this article actually said something in their edit summary, i'll re-post it here so something is on the talk page: "Passed for GA. Meets all criteria. Solid, well-referenced, interesting article.) 09:58, 20 February 2007 User:Bookworm857158367". Homestarmy 20:14, 5 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Ventidius Cumanus/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

It looks nice and comprehensive. Maybe a peer-review or a GAC review would be useful.--Yannismarou 20:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 20:38, 4 February 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 09:53, 30 April 2016 (UTC)