Talk:Utah State Route 161

Utah State Route 161 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 8, 2008	Good article nominee	Listed
August 24, 2009	WikiProject peer review	Reviewed

Current status: Good article

U.S. Roads: State highways / Utah Low‑importance

	U.S. roads portal This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Topics	U.S. state highways
Locations	Utah
	This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.
	This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Wikipedians in Utah may be able to help!

United States: Utah Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Utah portal This article is supported by WikiProject Utah (assessed as Low-importance).

Assessment edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The route description and history sections are both too short for this to merit B-class. For example, the fact that SR-161 is a former alignment of US-91 is mentioned briefly in the lead, but not in the history section where it should be. -- Kéiryn (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago3 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Utah State Route 161/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Hi! I'll be reviewing this article, but I've got class in 15 minutes and I have to leave. Give me 2-3 hours and I should have the reviews up...at the MOST I'll have it up by tonight. Cheers, —the_ed 17— 17:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I don't like the three red links in the template at the top. Could you put short histories of the three [Utah State Route 161 (1933-1935), Utah State Route 161 (1935-1953), and Utah State Route 161 (1961-1964)] in the 'History' section?

On hold for now; if you need help, just ask! —the_ed 17— 22:47, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Okay, it'll do. =) If any of those article are created, then add the {{seealso}} to the top. Cheers! —the_ed 17— 00:14, 8 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Add topic