Talk:Uniform Crime Reports

Cleanup and Expansion

A couple things I think still need to be done with the article

• Indexes should be discussed in the intro and separate sections on part I and II offenses should be created
• Most of the information in the index section is incorrect

e.g. lack of legal definition, Part I and II are not differentiated by arrest and report but are different types, etc

• Merge Index offenses article(stub) into this article, consider redirect
• Expansion of History section, Clearance rate, Validity, Future merger with NIBRS

I'll work on these as soon as I have some more time. Any further suggestions for expansion and cleanup would be appreciated. CRobey 17:28, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

I strongly recommend against merging UCR with NIBRS. They are very different approaches to crime statistics and should remain separate. According to the FBI (see http://www.fbi.gov/ucr/faqs.htm) not even a quarter of the data collected by the UCR program (about 16%) came from NIBRS as of 2004. Granted, that was six years ago, but considering law enforcement agencies are generally slow to change, and there are major budget problems, I would not be surprised if that figure hasn't changed much. Ometecuhtli2001 (talk) 22:42, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

Criticism of the UCR

I have boldly attempted clean up of this section. See what you think. :) Dlohcierekim 00:38, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

It's pretty good. I might expand on it when I get the chance. The ranking of crimes by seriousness is known as the hierarchy rule, which I have a little information about it that I can put in. I have a couple journal articles which talk about the 'dark figure' of unreported crimes in regards to the UCR. As for the rape, they do list it as a crime specifically against females. For males they consider the crime either an assault or sexual offense, which are Part II crimes.

The reason the UCR only list rape as females by males is that in California the law is written as female by male and I am sure that many other states laws are similar.

No it isn't. The criminal code in California which defines the elements of rape is PC 261, which begins: "Rape is an act of sexual intercourse accomplished with a person not the spouse of the perpetrator, under any of the following circumstances..." The legal definition of a crime and the UCR definition of a crime are two totally different things. Ometecuhtli2001 (talk) 22:31, 10 May 2010 (UTC)

UCR vs NCVS Image

I added an image I created from 2003/2004 UCR and NCVS data

UCR violent crime arrests: 586,558 (2004)

UCR violent crime reported: 1,367,009 (2004)

NCVS violent crime reported: 5,401,720 (2003)

It wasn't quite to scale. The two UCR sections are slightly larger than they should be, but I think it still gives the same idea. The unknown factor assumes an extra ~500,000 unreported violent crimes (conservative estimate). I think it's fairly representative but would be happy to modify it if anyone has suggestions. CRobey 18:09, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

Wiki Vandalism (20/06/07)

This is currently the talk page where an international en WP user lands after entering a search request for "report vandalism" on the main page. You should fix that for those who want to report vandalism on the wider project. I am tired of the worthless, counter-intuitive help files here.

.s

X ile 07:21, 21 June 2007 (UTC) - Talk

Question

Has there been any research done into false reports to the FBI for UCR by local jurisdictions? The reason I ask is because the former sheriff of Caroline County, Virginia is claiming that he had 90% of his cases solved when he was sheriff and I noticed that the national clearance rate for violent crimes is only 45.5% and for property crimes is only 16.3% in 2005.

67.142.130.18 08:31, 30 July 2007 (UTC)

Broken reference

Reference 4 into the FBI is broken. htom (talk) 01:38, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

@OtterSmith: I added an archived version for you. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 01:48, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Pharmaceutical theft

Mssing on this page ... Lotje (talk) 14:52, 15 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Uniform Crime Reports. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091211060154/http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/ to http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Contested move to Uniform Crime Reporting Program

Espoo I've undone your page move. While I understand the logic behind it, I would argue WP:COMMONNAME for UCR being called the Uniform Crime Reports. Most textbooks refer to it that way. I think a page move proposal (per WP:RM) is needed. Either way, we'll need a redirect from one name to the other. EvergreenFir (talk) 14:42, 21 February 2019 (UTC)

If you really want to keep the awkward name, you'll have to fix a lot of ungrammatical and illogical sentences with singular verbs etc. --Espoo (talk) 14:50, 21 February 2019 (UTC)