Talk:Unfulfillment

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Dekimasu in topic Requested move 11 December 2018

Requested move 11 December 2018 edit

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 07:12, 21 December 2018 (UTC)Reply


UnfulfillmentUnfulfillment (album) – This title is an inflection of Fulfillment, and as such the album is inappropriate as a primary topic. Much like plurals, tenses, and other inflections, Unfulfillment should be WP:PRIMARYREDIRECTed to the Fulfillment disambiguation page, necessitating this album topic to move. -- Netoholic @ 19:07, 11 December 2018 (UTC) --Relisting. Dreamy Jazz 🎷 talk to me | my contributions 22:56, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

  • Support I think Unfilfillment is all too common of a word to not have "(album)" written next to it. Redditaddict69 (talk) (contribs) 20:55, 11 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. This is an encyclopedia, WP:NOTADICT. This is the only encyclopedic usage we have of "Unfulfillment". I'll add a link to Wiktionary here and that should allay any concerns. Dohn joe (talk) 19:44, 12 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • This has nothing to do with WP:NOTADICT and everything to do with setting up redirects to aid in navigation and searching. -- Netoholic @ 06:21, 15 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Support Per nom, Unfulfillment is too common of a word for it to not be primary redirect. The album would need to have spawned the word or something of that nature for it to deserve to be a primary topic. JC7V (talk) 22:11, 17 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose Per WP:DAB and WP:NOTDICT there's no other encyclopedic primary topic by this name, plenty of other examples of this on WP including Unforgiven. Stick with the Wiktionary link and maybe a hatnote if really needed. - SanAnMan (talk) 21:01, 18 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Honestly, this album doesn't even look notable. If there's any other topic named "Unfulfillment" on Wikipedia (e.g. some unremarkable album only listed in a discog album), this should be a dab page. Nohomersryan (talk) 00:56, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
There's no other topic. The word itself only appears 25 times in the entirety of WP - five of which refer to this album. Dohn joe (talk) 03:20, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
      • Alright... so I'll oppose this move for now, but this article should maybe be taken to AfD Nohomersryan (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. WP:NOTDIC; should not redirect to a dictionary definition of its opposite, and there is no need for any disambiguation per WP:DAB because this is the only article of this title on Wikipedia. Softlavender (talk) 04:36, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose as Wikipedia is supposed to be an encyclopedia, not a dictionary, and no other term under this title warrants its own page. If people want a definition of the term, then just include a referral to Wikitionary for them. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 05:19, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply
  • Oppose. In my experiences, a {{R from antonym}} to a disambiguation per a word or term's WP:DICDEF is confusing. It’s better to just retain the status quo for now. Steel1943 (talk) 18:59, 19 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.