Talk:Unfriended

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Kperez18, Mwandell97, Seanyster1.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 04:33, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Poster

I've re-added the poster since there's no good reason at this point in time to remove it. It was originally released as Cybernatural and marking it as a work-in-progress title is factually incorrect. Work-in-progress titles are titles that are used before the film was released, however this film was given a release via the film festival circuit, so Cybernatural is the original title of the film. With that in mind, it's reasonable to keep the poster on the article because not only does it reflect on the original title of the film but we also have nothing to replace it with. When the new poster comes out we can always delete the poster at that point of time or move it down in the article. Until that time comes, removing it doesn't do anything for the article and since it was given a film festival release and was titled this (and most of the coverage refers to it as Cybernatural), it won't be misleading to leave it in the article. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 11:36, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

• I'm seeing some teaser posters, so hopefully we'll have a true poster soon to replace this with. Maybe we can move the old poster down to a release section? Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:01, 17 January 2015 (UTC)
• Oh! On a side note I do want to drop a note on here to let people know that the synopsis section is not a copyright violation. There are some sites that have been using the synopsis that was posted on here, so this synopsis predates those articles. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:06, 17 January 2015 (UTC)

• It's since been replaced with the teaser poster. I'm a little leery about adding that since those are designed to be temporary. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Copyedit

The marketing section needs a copyedit cleanup. I may be seeing things, but you can remove the tag if you want. CyanoTex; The Neutral Wikipedian 14:14, 16 March 2015 (UTC)

Any legitimacy on that end credit scene bit?

I can't seem to find any talks of it online. --97.92.93.185 (talk) 22:51, 20 June 2015 (UTC)

movie's gross

the reported $54 million gross is not sourced, is this a reliable source?--Shivanarayana (talk) 06:38, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Reviews are too slanted in favour

The reviews section contains only reviews in favour of the film, sometimes with such a chimerical tone as to be vexing (the section itself has a biased tone). This is despite the movie getting mixed reviews at best. A few critical reviews are in order here to better reflect the film's mixed reception. Alialiac (talk) 08:24, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

I agree that there could be fewer positive reviews and more mixed reviews. Also, it is good to use Metacritic's breakdown (not just its weighted average score) as a metric. There are 14 positive reviews, 12 mixed, and 4 negative. So maybe have something like four positive reviews, three mixed, and one negative for a reasonable balance. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 13:17, 16 September 2022 (UTC)