This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dogs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Canidae and commonly referred to as "dogs" and of which the domestic dog is but one of its many members, on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DogsWikipedia:WikiProject DogsTemplate:WikiProject DogsDogs articles
Nice job with the article. I'd recommending working the wikilinks at the bottom into the text somehow if you can, maybe one or two of them. Chrisrus (talk) 04:40, 12 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article invites more questions than it answers. It seems a bit shorter than it used to be, is that correct? I remember it as being longer. The arguement referred to, and the two men; none of it is cited. Anyone could come along at any moment and delete them saying "uncited claim", and there would be nothing you and I could do about it. Is this information published anywhere? Could we cite it? Other than "Bayed Solid", are there any other publications that have addressed this matter? Bayed Solid seems to be a party to the dispute and therefore maybe not the best source to talk about it. What about the local media? I have gathered from forums and such that it came down to the traditionalist bay dog people vs. the new catch dog people. Is that right? Readers what to know. C'mon, someone explain. Chrisrus (talk) 22:57, 5 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
_part_2.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}