This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Latest comment: 8 months ago2 comments2 people in discussion
This page is marked with a "tone" issue. I am finding this to be a bit spurious. And there is no justification in this Talk article. It is obvious that the editor(s) of this page admire Dr Blackstock, but not excessively so. And the statements made certainly seem to be backed up by references. I admit, though, that I have not done an exhaustive check. But, again, there is no justification of the mark to be found here. I am tempted to remove the mark. Unless someone can explain why I should not? RayKiddy (talk) 22:33, 25 January 2024 (UTC)Reply
