This redirect is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 14 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Any reason why there are two articles for the same ship? Typically, we detail the ship's service history in one article, even if it changes branches. Bonewah (talk) 14:54, 15 January 2010 (UTC)Reply
I don't have a problem with it as long as the article is titled USRC Mackinac (1903). Since the Navy only used the cutter for a couple of years and that with a Coast Guard crew. The rest of it's history was all Coast Guard. Cuprum17 (talk) 19:29, 8 May 2010 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
