Talk:Twilight: Where Darkness Begins

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Tokyogirl79 in topic Sources

I disagree with the proposed deletion. Twilight is a highly collectible out of print book series that has very little information available about it. It is difficult to find resoures with the book titles, authors and ISBN's. I plan to expand the article with plot summaries and cover art images, but as I am new to wikipedia it will take me a little time to complete. I am not really sure what to reference for the page as I took my information directly out of my physical books. Faaya (talk) 21:53, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

What the article really needs right now are reliable sources- that's what will prevent deletion. Newspaper articles, magazine articles, or reviews of these books in reasonably significant sources- two or three will be enough to save the article from speedy deletion. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:54, 11 March 2008 (UTC)hiReply

Unfortunately there really are not any sources other than sites selling used copies of the books - which is why I created this page in the first place. There are other Wikipedia book series pages with even less information that were not deleted, so I don't really understand why the deletion of this one is proposed. Faaya (talk) 22:05, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

For now, a reasonable case can be made that the books are notable because a few of the authors are. I can't swear that it would pass an AfD discussion, but I won't restore the tags, because I hope some sources will come to light in time. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 22:24, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

All I have found so far are some customer reviews which I linked. The books have been out of print for awhile but they are highly collectible and very rare. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Faaya (talkcontribs) 22:47, 11 March 2008 (UTC)Reply


I didn't know these books were rare. I picked up a bunch of them at a thrift store and I still have them. They just reminded me of when I was a kid.  :) Don't delete the page! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.178.136.97 (talk) 11:05, 2 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Sources

edit

I've added two sources, but it still needs more. Odds are they might be listed under individual book reviews in various different non-internet sources, but here's a start. Just a note: amazon reviews are NOT usable as reliable sources. Tokyogirl79 (talk) 07:32, 12 March 2012 (UTC)Reply