Talk:Trump–Tsai call

This article was nominated for deletion on 12 December 2016. The result of the discussion was keep.

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Donald Trump Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Donald Trump, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Donald Trump on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Donald TrumpWikipedia:WikiProject Donald TrumpTemplate:WikiProject Donald TrumpDonald Trump articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Taiwan Mid‑importance

	Taiwan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Taiwan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Taiwan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TaiwanWikipedia:WikiProject TaiwanTemplate:WikiProject TaiwanTaiwan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lasting significance edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Anyone have any indication of lasting significance here? I see there are no sources in the article from after December 2016 (when the event happened). In the last day, there was some news that "Trump spurns Taiwan president's suggestion of another phone call". Almost as though the call was part of a bigger subject regarding international relationships... Are people still of the mind that this call has the kind of sustained coverage and importance independent of the many articles on larger topics that could/do cover this subject? Trying to determine if a return to AfD would be a waste of time. Pinging Ansh666 from the last AfD only because he was explicit about "wait and see" rather than taking a clear k/m/r/d stance. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 18:03, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Seems to have gotten lost in all the Russia and North Korea mess. A new AfD wouldn't be a bad idea, though the lack of a clear merge target as mentioned in the previous one would IMO still drive a lot of people to keep. ansh 666 18:19, 29 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

NPOV Issue edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This article feels extremely one-sided at this point, with very little mention of expert concerns about diplomatic impacts, and a lot of mention of Republicans saying that it isn't a big deal. Some relevant links for that point of view:

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/dec/03/trump-angers-beijing-with-provocative-phone-call-to-taiwan-president

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/12/03/how-bad-was-trumps-taiwan-phone-call/

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/trumps-taiwan-phone-call-was-weeks-in-the-planning-say-people-who-were-involved/2016/12/04/f8be4b0c-ba4e-11e6-94ac-3d324840106c_story.html

https://time.com/4589641/donald-trump-china-taiwan-call/

https://www.cnn.com/2016/12/02/politics/donald-trump-taiwan/index.html

https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2016/12/trump-taiwan/509474/

198.52.130.148 (talk) 17:07, 30 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic