Talk:Trudie Styler

Employment tribunal

The contents about the tribunal were removed and the only rationale given was 'irrelevance'. I've undone the changes, but im not dogmatic about what should or shouldn't be in a wiki article. If the feeling is this isn't wiki material by all means delete, but i'd just appreciate a more through reasoning.Zaq12wsx 13:59, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

It's certainly small potatoes, but then I'm not convinced Trudie herself is notable enough for an article. I had to laugh at the quoted excerpt from the judgment: "When looked at holistically...." Who was the judge? Shirley MacLaine? TheScotch (talk) 11:26, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

I thought the tribunal were a bunch of PC types, but even they have holistical problems with Trudie Styler. If they are holisticaly challanged, lets hope no one is....HORIZONTALY challenged (must remember that word). As for TheScotch's initial remarks, Trudie Styler, Sting and Myself (that's Trudie Styler), and also her private jet are involved in blaming Chevron for all the cancer-cases that exist in Ecuador. She was active in the Earth Aid thingy. One might question how any the three of us know her name. This gives her fame enough as to earn her own wiki article. --85.164.220.159 (talk) 22:02, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Friend of John Ritchie

"A friend of John Ritchie, after a phone call from Matthew Vaughn's godfather she became an executive producer of Guy Ritchie's films..."

Could there POSSIBLY be a more confusing, convoluted English sentence?

B. Polhemus (talk) 17:52, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Yes, there could be. Bear in mind: this is wikipedia. TheScotch (talk) 11:28, 24 July 2010 (UTC)