This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bible, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Bible on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BibleWikipedia:WikiProject BibleTemplate:WikiProject BibleBible articles
Kind of ironic, since it's a KJV-Only organization now, that the TBS split over the "[i]nclusion of the Biblical Apocrypha in published Bibles" since the KJV had it originally ... but I think the link to Biblical Apocrypha is more appropriate than apocrypha in general, because the KJV had only the Biblical Apocrypha, not any of the other huge corpus of generic apocryphal writings that have never been in the Christian Bible (gnostic, etc). The kind of apocrypha the TBS is objecting to is specificially the Biblical Apocrypha. It's much less confusing to link directly to the Biblical Apocrypha than to link to the general page and have readers drill down until they find the stub that links to the article. Scott1329m19:44, 3 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
