Talk:Trinidad and Tobago general election, 2010

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Cyberbot II in topic External links modified

Infobox edit

Should we merge the UNC and COP in the infobox into a single People's Partnership? Guettarda (talk) 19:24, 22 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Statistics edit

Are the total votes received by each candidiate in the different constituencies available?? That would add alot of value to the page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 66.28.226.77 (talk) 12:34, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

Haven't seen final numbers yet. I've also heard (but not seen official reports) that recounts have been requested in 3 constituencies. So I'm guessing it will be a while before we see final numbers. Guettarda (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

NNV edit

The NNV party was a complete non-entity and shouldn't be included in the major listing of results and parties as if it any way impacted the overall outcome of the election. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 201.238.81.98 (talk) 20:30, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

All parties that contested the elections should be included in the results. Number 57 21:03, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Trinidad and Tobago general election, 2010. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 20:15, 30 January 2016 (UTC)Reply