Talk:Tremblay station

Buses Low‑importance

	Buses portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Buses, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of buses on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusesWikipedia:WikiProject BusesTemplate:WikiProject Busesbus transport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Canada: Ontario / Ottawa Low‑importance

	Canada portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ontario portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ontario.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Ottawa (assessed as Low-importance).

Trains: Stations / Rapid transit Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Stations.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Rapid transit.

Demerged edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Further to JForget's suggestion below, I was bold and demerged this article and the article on the adjacent railway station. Also as mentioned below, the information on the actual train station, a designated heritage structure, was being lost amidst bus route information. The demerger is in keeping with the Toronto example, where Union Station (Toronto) and Union (TTC) are separate articles. It is also in keeping with what appears to be the convention for Ottawa transitway stations -- e.g. St. Laurent Station (OC Transpo) and St. Laurent Shopping Centre are separate articles, Tunney's Pasture Station (OC Transpo) and Tunney's Pasture are separate articles, etc. - Skeezix1000 11:40, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Overpass paragraph edit

Latest comment: 17 years ago6 comments2 people in discussion

The following discussion is reproduced from the talk page at Ottawa Train Station. Please do not modify it. It was moved here when the information on the the transitway station was moved to this article. Additional comments, if any, can be made below this box.

Not really sure how this paragraph on a proposed overpass, that might never get built, is relevant to the train station. Proximity does not equal relevance. Is the overpass intended to serve rail passengers? Is it intended to facilitate access to the train station? It's not clear. Even if it can be shown that the intended purpose is to provide easier access to the station, it's not evident that an overpass merits an entire paragraph (if it merits mention at all) in the article. Skeezix1000 11:15, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I've put that paragraph since it is the article about both the Transit Station and the Train Station. The Master Plan says :"Provides enhanced transit accessibility to the stadium (Lynx) and adjacent employment area" [1]. That paragraph was put related to the Transitway Station.

This is two distinct things, I'm wondering if de-merging the article would be better, so we would the Transit stop in a separate article --JForget 02:09, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

If the purpose of the overpass is to facilitate transit access, then that's fine, but it should be made clear in the paragraph. Right now, the paragraph simply refers to a pedestrian overpass, the purpose of which is unclear. It isn't even clear from the current wording that the overpass would be accessible from the train station.

As for demerging the article, yes I agree. The information on the train station building is slowly being lost in the morass of trivial bus route data. Skeezix1000 11:22, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Demerger done (see below). Any further discussion on the overpass should continue at the article on the transitway station, and I have reproduced this discussion on the talk page at that location. Skeezix1000 11:42, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the discussion from the talk page at Ottawa Train Station. Additional comments can be made below.

I would just add: given that it is just an overpass, that overpasses over the Queensway are not uncommon, and that it may never be built, a simple sentence for the proposal, with a footnote for the reference, would likely more than suffice. Skeezix1000 11:53, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks! I've cut also that paragraph to about three lines, limiting just to the general proposal of the project and the possible (or should I say IMO likely) scrapping of the project with the departure of the Ottawa Lynx in 2007. --JForget 20:43, 8 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Add topic