This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iran, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Iran on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project where you can contribute to the discussions and help with our open tasks.IranWikipedia:WikiProject IranTemplate:WikiProject IranIran articles
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
but the total lack of references. If you can give a book, journal article or other reliable source for the fact of the treaty, it doesn't matter all that much what you call it. But we DO need to have a reference that says it existed! --Alvestrand (talk) 17:14, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Yes, I know, that's why I've been spending the last hour finding and formatting them. Phil Bridger (talk) 17:43, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Would it be more correct to clarify that these territories were formerly occupied by or were under influence of Persia, rather than Persian territories? These are Armenia, Azerbaijan and Georgia and they, by large, are/were not regarded as such. - Alsandro · T · w:ka:Th · T 16:47, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
