Talk:Torre dei Gualandi

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

Is this the same as the Torre dei Gualandi? -- The Anome 17:50, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

ISO 9000

edit

Could some writing be added that makes it clear why the link to the article on "ISO 9000" is included in the "see also" list?69.86.65.186 (talk) 02:38, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Christopher L. SimpsonReply

Yes and no. The whole point of a "See Also" section is for items of interest that are not covered in the main article. Expanding it would remove the need for it to appear in See Also in the first place.
However, in this instance there appears to be no connection, so I've removed it along with an unecessary disambig link. Chaheel Riens (talk) 08:16, 20 June 2014 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Torre dei Gualandi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:14, 4 January 2018 (UTC)Reply