| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
POV Pushing edit
The headings "Poor Environmental Record" and "Questionable Finances" are clearly biased - I don't know why people would fill an article with value judgments like the ones in here (I mean, I do, but the way it's been done here is just silly). The "Environmental Record" section is pretty blatantly pushing for his opponent in this election, as if this politician's career has been built around opposition of random legislation proposed by his current opponent. I honestly think that the bias in this article is pretty obvious, but I really don't know what it should be replaced with.
I've put the POV check tag on the article. Défenseur (talk) 03:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
It seems like a campaign ad for his opponent edit
The References lack links, although they are available. Ebrockway (talk) 06:44, 15 November 2008 (UTC)
Cleaning Up POV edit
I've rewritten it and made it a straight bio piece, without much mention of his voting record (similar to other Senator bios). OCNative (talk) 08:46, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
Campaign violations and penalties edit
Why is this removed? These are facts of events that have occurred that voters might want to know about. Many other politicians have this information in their wikipedia page. Pmacdee (talk) 04:33, 16 February 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pmacdee (talk • contribs) 13:16, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
- Jerzeykydd wasn't removing it he was moving it to a different section. Although looking at it, I'm not sure why...Eomund (talk) 05:42, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Fair enough, hopefully it will stay. Thanks for reviewing this. Pmacdee (talk) 13:41, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
Wife edit
"future Assemblywoman Audra Strickland" reads awkward. I understand it means that she was not a member of the Assembly in 1997, but it could also be construed as she is not yet in the Assembly. Is there a style template for something like this?47.137.182.8 (talk) 19:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)