Talk:To My Surprise (album)

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Andrzejbanas in topic Assessment comment
Good articleTo My Surprise (album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 28, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
April 4, 2010Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on January 19, 2009.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that To My Surprise was the only album ever released by the alternative rock band To My Surprise before they disbanded in 2006?
Current status: Good article

Assessment comment

edit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:To My Surprise (album)/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
Start class:
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox
  •  Y A lead section giving an overview of the album
  •  Y A track listing
  •  Y Reference to at least primary personnel by name (must specify performers on the current album; a band navbox is insufficient)
  •  Y Categorisation at least by artist and year

C class:

  •  Y All the start class criteria
  •  Y A reasonably complete infobox, including cover art
  •  Y At least one section of prose (in addition to the lead section)
  •  Y A track listing containing track lengths and authors for all songs
  •  Y A "personnel" section listing performers, including guest musicians.

B class:

  •  Y All the C class criteria
  •  Y A completed infobox, including cover art and most technical details
  •  Y A full list of personnel, including technical personnel and guest musicians
  •  Y No obvious issues with sourcing, including the use of blatantly improper sources.
  •  Y No significant issues exist to hamper readability, although it may not rigorously follow WP:MOS
Not bad, but the introduction to the article will have to be expanded upon. Andrzejbanas (talk) 19:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Last edited at 19:50, 15 January 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 08:54, 30 April 2016 (UTC)