Talk:Timothy Bradley, Jr.
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Timothy Bradley, Jr. redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Proposal: change no contest to win for bradley
editI dont think one decision by California State Athletic Commission should speak for the whole boxing world. All references agree Bradley dominated the frist 3 rounds in the fight againnst nate campbell, and the referee also ruled it a win for Bradley. Either of the following decisions should be used instead of No Contest:
Someone65 (talk) 10:11, 1 February 2011 (UTC)
There is a lot of mess in that section. The Lamont Petersen fight is under the Bradley-Campbell fight.
About the Bradley-Campbell fight: the fight is officially a No Contest. That is California State Athletic Comission that decides that, not random fans. The rules states very clearly, that if a fight is stopped before the end of the fourth round by a cut caused by an accidental headbutt, it is a No Contest. So everything is according to the rules. So I will bring this section in order in a couple of days, if there are no protests.
Fightdane (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2011 (UTC)
I think it should be Bradley's Victory, he was the better fighter in those first 3 rounds it should be counted as TD. The referee ruled it as a win so it should be a win. It looks bad on his record. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.21.50.94 (talk) 02:21, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Bradley is a cheat! He didn't deserve to get the belt! Everyone knows Pacquiao won and he even knows that. I hate Timothy Bradley and whoever else cheated to help him win! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 206.255.108.147 (talk) 05:45, 12 June 2012 (UTC)
Fighting out of?
editFor the Bradley-Alexander fight, he was announced as fighting out of North Palm Springs. [1] I think that is where he is always announced as fighting out of. Is there any reason not to change the first sentence to reflect that?--Don King's hair (talk) 20:55, 2 March 2012 (UTC)
Vegan diet?
editShouldn't Bradley's vegan diet be mentioned on the page? There are various sources affirming that he views it as very important to his training: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052970204520204577247533423440946.html http://www.badlefthook.com/2012/2/28/2829768/pacquiao-vs-bradley-timothy-bradley-vegan-diet-next-fight-boxing-news — Preceding unsigned comment added by 118.172.205.125 (talk) 06:45, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
Main event unofficial score cards for Pacquaio vs Bradley fight
editHeading text
editSource:[7] Writer Agency Scorecard Winner 1 Barry Tompkins Showtime 119-110 Pacquiao 2 Harold Lederman HBO 119-109 Pacquiao 3 Ray Markarian The Sweet Science 119-109 Pacquiao 4 Michael Marley Examiner 119-109 Pacquiao 5 Dan Rafael ESPN 119-109 Pacquiao 6 Vittorio Tafur San Francisco Chronicle 119-109 Pacquiao 7 Michael Woods The Sweet Science 119-109 Pacquiao 8 Ramon Aranda 3 More Rounds 118-110 Pacquiao 9 Mario Cabrera Boxing Republic 118-110 Pacquiao 10 Nigel Collins ESPN 118-110 Pacquiao 11 Mike Coppinger Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao 12 Ace Freeman Fight Fan 118-110 Pacquiao 13 Rich Marotta KFI Los Angeles 118-110 Pacquiao 14 Kelsey McCarson The Sweet Science 118-110 Pacquiao 15 Gabriel Montoya MaxBoxing 118-110 Pacquiao 16 Pete O’Brien USA Today 118-110 Pacquiao 17 Eric Raskin Grantland 118-110 Pacquiao 18 Michael Rosenthal Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao 19 Colin Seymour Examiner 118-110 Pacquiao 20 Ryan Songalia Ring Magazine 118-110 Pacquiao 21 Ryan Burton Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao 22 Scott Christ Bad Left Hook 117-111 Pacquiao 23 Tim Dahlberg Associated Press 117-111 Pacquiao 24 Gareth Davies London Daily Telegraph 117-111 Pacquiao 25 Doug Fischer Ring Magazine 117-111 Pacquiao 26 David Greisman Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao 27 Jorge Hernandez The Low Blow 117-111 Pacquiao 28 Kevin Iole Yahoo! Sports 117-111 Pacquiao 29 Robert Littal Black Sports Online 117-111 Pacquiao 30 Steve Kim Max Boxing 117-111 Pacquiao 31 Ryan Maquiñana Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao 32 David Mayo MLive 117-111 Pacquiao 33 Kieran Mulvaney HBO 117-111 Pacquiao 34 Lance Pugmire Los Angeles Times 117-111 Pacquiao 35 Chris Robinson Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao 36 Cliff Rold Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao 37 Champ Ross Da Truth Boxing 117-111 Pacquiao 38 Luis Sandoval Boxing Scene 117-111 Pacquiao 39 Jonathan Sakti Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao 40 Tim Starks Queensberry Rules 117-111 Pacquiao 41 Richie Tomassini Comcast SportsNet Bay Area 117-111 Pacquiao 42 Darren Velasco 8 Count News 117-111 Pacquiao 43 Rick Reeno Boxing Scene 116-112 Pacquiao 44 George Willis New York Post 116-112 Pacquiao 45 Steve Zemach Queensberry Rules 116-112 Pacquiao 46 Salmaan Ahmed Fight Today UK 116-112 Pacquiao 47 Armando Alvarez Telemundo 115-113 Pacquiao 48 Jake Donovan Boxing Scene 115-113 Pacquiao 49 Lem Satterfield Ring Magazine 115-113 Pacquiao 50 Thomas Hauser HBO 115-114 Bradley 51 Bart Barry HBO 116-115 Bradley 52 Brian Kenny Top Rank 116-112 Bradley 53 Springs Toledo The Sweet Science 117-112 Pacquiao 54 Michael Galvin RAF 116-112 Pacquiao
Total: Pacquiao 51, Bradley 3. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 125.60.241.205 (talk) 00:48, 13 June 2012 (UTC)