This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Latest comment: 7 months ago3 comments2 people in discussion
@Rillington: Why do you insist on readding years when nothing happened and listing "no events"? A timeline is for events. If there's nothing to say about a subject, like in all articles, it's better to just not write anything. It seems to me, anyway. I'm willing to learn why that's wrong. InedibleHulk (talk) 19:27, 23 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@InedibleHulk: Thank you for not getting into an edit-war with me on this and, instead, for asking this question on the talkpage. The use of 'no events' for months and years when a notable event did not happen is an established format which has been accepted on Wikipedia for many years. Plus more notable events are always being identified and added so the number of 'no event' months/years diminishes over time. Rillington (talk) 02:22, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
