This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Greece, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Greece on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GreeceWikipedia:WikiProject GreeceTemplate:WikiProject GreeceGreek articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Atheism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of atheism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AtheismWikipedia:WikiProject AtheismTemplate:WikiProject AtheismAtheism articles
Add Atheism info box to all atheism related talk pages (use {{WikiProject Atheism}} or see info box)
Ensure atheism-related articles are members of Atheism by checking whether [[Category:Atheism]] has been added to atheism-related articles – and, where it hasn't, adding it.
Try to expand stubs. Ideas and theories about life, however, are prone to generating neologisms, so some stubs may be suitable for deletion (see deletion process).
State atheism needs a reassessment of its Importance level, as it has little to do with atheism and is instead an article about anti-theist/anti-religious actions of governments.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Just to clarify this point, so that we don't have to fight an edit war with our anonymous IP friend. It's certainly true that we are lacking precise information on Theodorus's philosophical views concerning god or the gods. But he was certainly deemed an atheist of one sort or another in the ancient world, even if it was merely denying "the existence of the deities of popular belief". Category:Atheist philosophers is a valid category for Theodorus - one can argue that he doesn't fully fit in the category by some definitions, but anyone who has spent time categorising people on Wikipedia will know that it's constantly the case that people rarely fit perfectly into categories. In this case though I don't think it's remotely controversial to call Theodorus an "Atheist philosopher". Pasicles (talk) 16:40, 3 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The charge of atheism is sustained by the popular designation of Atheus, by the authority of...
There follows a list of authors with primary source citations that are contrasted with Clement of Alexandria (also a primary source citation). I was going to reword it on the assumption that the editor had merely located the term athoes or atheus in the writers mentioned, which would be OR. But I'm not sure that is what is meant. We certainly cannot decide that the writers are opposite Clement by checking if other sources use a word (atheist) that they might have used to describe him even if Clement were right. But I'm not checking the sources myself and so I won't fix the wording and possibly render it false. It needs secondary sources. Srnec (talk) 00:24, 19 July 2022 (UTC)Reply
