 | The Vote That Counted has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: July 1, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
Note edit
It is possible that a surviving copy of MVP Vol 8 No. 1 might exist in an archive without its front pages damaged. Thanhouser often advertised in the front of these pages and it would likely contain a film still. I've exhausted my ability to obtain them at this time. ChrisGualtieri (talk) 04:13, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:The Vote That Counted/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 22:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
The sweep is now complete. JAGUAR 22:02, 30 June 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguations: No links found.
Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.
Checking against the GA criteria edit
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): 
- I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD
- Nothing on the Production in the lead, despite the section being scarce the lead must summarise, even if it's minor
- The plot summary in the lead is quite extensive
- Is the list of people in the production sentence a definite list of people who worked on the film? The lead says otherwise
- The names in the Cast section are not in the lead
- Production needs to be fleshed out, if the red link people aren't notable then they should be removed
- a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- The assertions regarding the cameramen could be original research, but both candidates are included in the reference given.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Another well researched article that has nothing to make it be put on hold. This is the final Tanhouser film in the GAN queue, so it's been a pleasure. 
JAGUAR 11:02, 1 July 2015 (UTC)