Talk:The Vatican Rag

Latest comment: 5 months ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination

Did you know nomination edit

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 06:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

"The Vatican Rag" by Tom Lehrer

Converted from a redirect by Hameltion (talk). Self-nominated at 03:45, 4 November 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/The Vatican Rag; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.Reply

  • A Montalbán hook would be better with more details:
    ALT2a ... that after Tom Lehrer performed "The Vatican Rag" (audio featured), Ricardo Montalbán reportedly yelled "I will die for my religion!" and Lehrer quipped "... as long as you don't fight for your religion"?
    By my reckoning, that's exactly 200 characters, including an allowance for (audio featured). MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 06:27, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
    • Good point, ce'd the expansion slightly. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 23:57, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
      •   Article is new enough, long enough, written neutrally, and appears to be free of copyvios. The audio file is in the public domain. QPQ has been done. The hooks are cited, interesting, and formatted correctly (assuming 'audio featured' is acceptable for audio files). I like both ALT0 and ALT1b. Good job. gobonobo + c 19:29, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
        • In ALT0, I changed "for the Catholic Church" to "about the Catholic Church". It certainly wasn't written for them. MANdARAX • XAЯAbИAM 20:33, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
          • Hmm, "for" was intentional but maybe too jokingly credulous. Split into separate lines if that's okay. Hameltion (talk | contribs) 20:54, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply