Talk:The Menu (2022 film)

Latest comment: 6 months ago by 50.34.204.199 in topic Description of motive

Billing block edit

As the film is still upcoming and features an ensemble cast, a list of actors should be omitted from the infobox until a billing block appears. Please note ensemble films such as Knives Out 2 and Untitled Wes Anderson film. Parts of the ensemble are already listed in the lead and are repeated in #Cast. Including a list of actors but not adding others becomes picking and choosing and can lead to the infobox becoming crowded. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 23:46, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Picking and choosing is dictating who goes in and where as a means of preference, not by means of looking to avoid just tossing every name in when, as you saw at Wonka. And honestly you practiced this by placing Hoult higher than when he was announced but I saw your point about his being noted as a main lead. I can see the point when it comes to the Wes Anderson film because he has notoriously massive casts and it’s hard to discern how much of a role they will serve for the film. My rule of thumb is until a billing block forms that 10 should be the max number of names added in upon new cast announcements. Knives Out 2 only has only 10 names total anyway so I don’t see the concern about crowding. Rusted AutoParts 23:58, 5 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
The Deadline article released today said the five actors were also part of the ensemble. So, should they be listed too? Leaving them out because of a personal rule does not make sense. Repeating the same list in the infobox, lead, and #Cast also seems repetitive. Some Dude From North Carolina (talk) 00:57, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
But like you said you don’t want to crowd the infobox when there’s no set block yet. At the same time we shouldn’t also leave the infobox section empty as a result. It’s a series of rules one has to set for oneself when there’s no given guideline to follow. At Deaths in 2021 we implement a rule of three when it comes to listing a deceased career highlights. It’s not a binding rule, but it’s a handy rule of thumb to use so as to not drown an entry with career highlights. Thats why I use a max 10 rule for infoboxes. It says from me making a personal dictation about “oh, Judith Light is probably a cameo so let’s take her out” situation. Rusted AutoParts 01:31, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
Is this all academic now, as the film has been released? Or should it be preserved as a glowing example of the negotiation and determination of actor-listing protocols here at WP, where, frankly, many a well-meaning soul such as I (and perhaps—dare I say it?—some of you) has gone to assuage their feelings of not leading quite as significant or influential a life as they may have envisioned and/or preferred? – AndyFielding (talk) 02:11, 19 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Description of motive edit

At the end of the movie, describing the only person to survive the evening - "Julian packs the food for her, and he and the staff allow her to leave, in appreciation for her genuine respect for his cooking." I believe this description should be edited to include the possibility that he allowed her to leave because she "played the game", or spoke in restaurant code, in other words. Any way it is described, the reason should be left open for other possibilities unless we know for sure. 137.188.108.201 (talk) 19:16, 11 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

I haven't seen the film, but your last sentence sums it up: unless it's unambiguous, it's got to be worded unpresumptuously. YouCanDoBetter (talk) 03:26, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Seems like it was removed. I support that decision.
Mike Allen 03:48, 12 January 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia movie pages do not usually decline to tell spoilers, example the Crying Game page is honest about the character's gender and sex. So I am surprised that two crucial facts were left out of the Plot summary here. 1. They set up the meaning of the ending very early during the tour, when Elsa specifies how long they age their beef, and then it is belabored for the audience that if the beef if aged the wrong amount of time it can be lethal. Audience members who are mindful of this setup, understand that when she leaves at the end eating the beef burger, that she may in fact be eating toxic beef that will tear her up inside shortly after. This sheds much light on them letting her go, and changes the ending entirely. This needs no additional citing in this article, just a mention of the beef aging details, and a reference back to it at the end. 50.34.191.65 (talk) 05:27, 9 May 2023 (UTC)DudeReply
I think that's quite a contrived interpretation. My interpretation of that earlier scene was that Elsa was just winding the guests up for asking a stupid question. Realistically, beef that was agreed for too little time is not going to be harmful.
Not saying your interpretation is wrong, but I doubt it's a common one. 2A00:23C8:B713:FD01:E96F:A2EF:3C2B:942A (talk) 20:02, 16 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I can site that this is not a fringe interpretation : https://screenrant.com/the-menu-chef-slowik-killed-margot-cheeseburger-theory/ 50.34.204.199 (talk) 06:10, 11 October 2023 (UTC)DudeReply

Tyler's death edit

It's not clear in the movie if Tyler was ordered to hang himself. All we know is that Slowik whispers something in his ear, and this may not have been an order MrMagical7812 (talk) 19:00, 4 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

"The Menu (upcoming film)" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  The redirect The Menu (upcoming film) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 February 27 § The Menu (upcoming film) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 15:54, 27 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Mr. George Diaz edit

I understand that the credits show him as a "movie star", but is it really necessary to avoid his given name in the plot summary as well? Cyanurea (talk) 05:23, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

One reason is simply that it would be confusing to have someone named who isn't listed in the credit list. Also, what would using his name actually add? A name is basically just a label, and 'movie star' serves just as well as a label when no-one else is referred to thus.Sbishop (talk) Sbishop (talk) 08:21, 10 May 2023 (UTC)Reply