Talk:The Fifth Discipline

Active discussions

remove broken linkEdit

who is interested could still see it here. ----Erkan Yilmaz 23:15, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Restored. There were questions about notability so I restored this and a previously-removed "global" reference as well. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:33, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Notability is not an issueEdit

An editor recently asked why this page doesn't violate WP:CSD#G11, which states that unambiguous advertising or promotion is not allowed on Wikipedia. The implication was that this article does not belong in the project.

I checked Google Scholar and this book has over 3700 citations. Even if those numbers are inflated by 100%, it's still over 1800 citations in Google Scholar, more than enough to put a heavy WP:BURDEN on anyone who claims the book does not meet WP:GNG or WP:BOOK. davidwr/(talk)/(contribs) 20:37, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Comment should be move to talk page?Edit

The comment at Talk:The_Fifth_Discipline/Comments would be more appropriate here on the talk page, rather than on the banner comments. Jonpatterns (talk) 16:42, 30 March 2014 (UTC)

Assessment commentEdit

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:The Fifth Discipline/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

This page seems to be confusing. The intro text is too short with respect to outline of the book chapters.

Last edited at 08:39, 18 December 2007 (UTC). Substituted at 08:07, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

Return to "The Fifth Discipline" page.