Talk:The Jester (hacktivist)
(Redirected from Talk:Th3j35t3r)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Softlemonades in topic Mostly self published sources
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Jester (hacktivist) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 30 days  |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about The Jester (hacktivist). Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about The Jester (hacktivist) at the Reference desk. |
 | A fact from The Jester (hacktivist) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 7 January 2011 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
.svg){kind=small} | Daily pageviews of this article
A graph should have been displayed here but graphs are temporarily disabled. Until they are enabled again, visit the interactive graph at pageviews.wmcloud.org |
Why was my edit undone without comment?
editI made a factual and fully cited edit to this page. This was undone by Chrissymad with no reason listed. Why? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ts876345 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Ts876345: @Chrissymad: can speak for theirself, but I'm guessing it's because, although your information had references, none of those references qualified as reliable sources (with the exception of the SST report which was used to source a minor claim). Λυδαcιτγ 08:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Mostly self published sources
editInfosec Island was a blog with click bait titles like Is Your Kid Engaged in a DDoS Attack?
Infosec Island said it was an online community, infosec portal and a social network all-in-one.
Posts ended with the note the views expressed in this post are the opinions of the Infosec Island member that posted this content. Infosec Island is not responsible for the content or messaging of this post.
Softlemonades (talk) 09:55, 11 November 2022 (UTC)