 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 19 July 2020 edit
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
 | It was proposed in this section that Tensorsketch be renamed and moved to Tensor Sketch.
result: Links: current log • target log
This is template {{subst:Requested move/end}} |
Tensorsketch → Tensor Sketch – I believe the name "Tensor Sketch" is more common (has ten times more google hits than Tensorsketch). As a relatively new name, it doesn't yet qualify for a compound noun. I have renamed the instances inside the article, but it would be best to also move the article itself. Thomasda (talk) 13:24, 19 July 2020 (UTC)—Relisting. DannyS712 (talk) 14:37, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- Support lowercase Tensor sketch. The majority of papers seem to use it in lowercase. – Thjarkur (talk) 18:17, 26 July 2020 (UTC)
- The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Overall time? edit
The definition says the speedup results in O(d1d2 + kd1 + kd2) . Shouldn't it be O(k + kd1 + kd2) as k < d = d1d2 ? Balbapa (talk) 16:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)