Talk:Tavče gravče

WikiProject Food and drink Tagging

This article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . Maximum and carefull attention was done to avoid any wrongly tagging any categories , but mistakes may happen... If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 16:52, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

Error

The Greek fasoulotavas is different from the Macedonian tavče-gravče. The Macedonian dish is actually a development on an ordinary peasant dish which was popularized by street vendors who would sell it in a then-forgotten fashion (i.e. in ornamental earthen pots). It's something peculiar to Macedonia the republic. --58.7.207.108 (talk) 11:53, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Citation(s) which explicitly differentiate the two dishes must be provided to support these claims. If Prebranac remains in the article, so should fasoulotavas. Beat of the tapan (talk) 11:36, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

1. Disagree: citations need to be added to prove it's the same dish, citations dont need to be added to prove they are different dishes. This is an article about tavce gravce not fasoultavas, so it doesnt make sense why fasoultavas would be mentioned.

2. If tavce gravce and fasoulotavas are the same dish, then why should this article be named tavce gravce and not fasoulotavas? That would only make sense if it was proved that tavce gravce was invented first and there's no evidence of that listed on this article at the moment.

3. As for your comment on prebranac, I have no idea, maybe that should also be deleted? Apples&Manzanas (talk) 18:10, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Further comment - i agree, the serbian dish appears to be a different dish. I think that whole section should just be deleted. This page should be dedicated to the North Macedonian food. There's no evidence that the North Macedonian food came before the Serbian one, and there's no evidence I can see that the Serbian food came before the Macedonian one. So I think it's safe to say that wikipedia should treat these as separate dishes unless reliable sources can demonstrate that one of these dishes came first and was then adopted by the other country. Apples&Manzanas (talk) 18:22, 14 November 2019 (UTC)

Butter bean?

The butter bean link is to a disambiguation page. Is Phaseolus lunatus or Phaseolus coccineus the intended target? I'd guess the former, but am a little confused by the use of the term "fresh beans" in the intro, which might indicate the latter. Also, is the type of bean important to Tavče gravče, or are there variations with different types of bean? The article is unclear. -- 160.129.138.186 (talk) 00:28, 17 November 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Tavče gravče. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090626204429/http://balkan-cuisine.com/2009/05/gravche-tavche.html to http://balkan-cuisine.com/2009/05/gravche-tavche.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:15, 13 January 2018 (UTC)