This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mining, a collaborative project to organize and improve articles related to mining and mineral industries. If you would like to participate, you can edit the attached article, or visit the project page, where you can see a list of open tasks, join in the discussion, or join the project.MiningWikipedia:WikiProject MiningTemplate:WikiProject MiningMining articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dams, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Dams on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DamsWikipedia:WikiProject DamsTemplate:WikiProject DamsDam articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
took out "pond" from the first second section: not a pond if it's 540,000,000m3 in volume.. that's ridiculous. it's like calling making the Atlantic Ocean a lake. Atlantic Lake...Gw2005 (talk) 19:02, 3 June 2010 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Syncrude Tailings Dam/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
== Just an idea. ==
I am concerned with the accuracy of the statistics in regards to it being the second-largest dam by volume in the world. It seems like there are no reliable sources on the internet yet found to benefit this article. Maybe for the sake of being surely accurate, it could be altered to saying largest tailings dam by volume.
