Talk:Swingin' (Dino album)

Latest comment: 10 years ago by Armbrust in topic Requested move

Requested move

edit
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved to Swingin' (Dino album). An article for the Arturo Sandoval album now exists. Armbrust The Homunculus 05:04, 26 December 2013 (UTC)Reply


SwinginSwingin' (album) – The new title is the correct spelling of the album (whose article as of now exists as a redirect to the musician). Erpert WHAT DO YOU WANT??? 05:21, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

Yes, though some are a later similarly titled album. Done: Swingin' (Arturo Sandoval album) In ictu oculi (talk) 02:18, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
User:BDD, what you're saying is tantamount to saying let's not let Google Books and the real world affect titling. It's also contrary to WP:AT and WP:DAB which refer to the real world outside our article stock. Note also WP:REDLINK "Good red links help Wikipedia—they encourage new contributors in useful directions, and remind us that Wikipedia is far from finished." In ictu oculi (talk) 01:58, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Yes, that's exactly what I'm saying. Titles should help readers find articles. There's no point in rearranging titles to help readers find nonexistent articles. We disagree on WP:D's "covered by Wikipedia," but surely we can agree that it doesn't apply to topics outside of Wikipedia. This is not to say that Wikipedia is complete; it's simply a statement of pragmatism. --BDD (talk) 17:36, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
Don't agree at all. I'm constantly annoyed by looking for notable topics in Wikipedia and landing on a page about an ephemeral pop song or wrestler. The project has a massive systemic bias to crap and trivia. Keeping titling connected to the real universe of books is more likely to result in a better encyclopedia long term. In ictu oculi (talk) 13:31, 22 December 2013 (UTC)Reply
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.