Talk:Susan Fleming

Latest comment: 6 years ago by ShelbyMarion in topic Suzanne Fleming
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Susan Fleming. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:51, 11 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Suzanne Fleming

edit

Noted Marx Brothers scholar and author Matthew Coniam has researched Susan Fleming's career and uncovered the fact that prior to being professionally known as "Susan" she worked as "Suzanne." (See: http://marxcouncil.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/a-tale-of-two-susans.html). Many online sources and databases, including IMDB, mistakenly list "Susan" and "Suzanne" as two separate people. This means two things: 1) as the article stands now Wikipedia is contributing to the legacy of misinformation regarding this person, and 2) this article has incomplete information regarding her biography and film career. However, this information is original research and for the time being is prohibited from being used as a reference for this article. I suggest an eye be kept open if this information eventually finds its way into a recognized reliable source, at which time it could be added. Or--considering Mr. Coniam's research is sourced to reliable period publications, such as Variety, The New York Eagle and Picture Play, among others--would those qualify as enough viable references to include this in the article now? ShelbyMarion (talk) 14:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)Reply