Talk:Suborna Mustafa

Latest comment: 15 years ago by 207.138.98.253 in topic Untitled

Untitled edit

O.K......where do I start? This is not a proper Wikipedia article. It contains poor English, repeatedly flouts the 'no point of view' rule, has no citations and is so hopelessly biased towards its subject it looks like it has been written as hagiography by one of her relatives or close friends. Or maybe even by the subject herself? (I hope that last suggestion isn't the case because that REALLY WOULD be pathetic.) Anyone else agree? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.138.98.253 (talk) 08:47, 17 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

O.K. - since the above criticism was made someone seems to have substantially reduced the length of the article. A lot of the weirder, inappropriate material has been removed, which is good. However, the wording in the existing article is still quite bizarre in places. In particular, the second paragraph could really do with a rewrite!