 | This article was nominated for deletion on 21 January 2009. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Where's the substance?
editI don't see an encyclopedic biographic article here; I see a puffed collection of quotes from minor reviews. THF (talk) 14:35, 25 January 2009 (UTC)
- Agreed. I'd toss this up for deletion, although he appears he might be notable enough for inclusion. Article's a mess, and requires rewrite from top to bottom. Is indeed a puff piece. Alphageekpa (talk) 16:54, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
- Well, my AFD nomination was rejected a couple of weeks ago. I don't understand the insistence that adding up three hits in a Google search = notability. To W.H. suffers the identical problem. THF (talk) 17:15, 31 January 2009 (UTC)