 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was tagged for speedy deletion under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion but a reviewing administrator or uninvolved experienced editor declined the request on the basis that: The claim for the golf course is assertion of notability. This article should not be tagged again for speedy deletion under the same criterion and, unless a valid, separate speedy deletion basis exists, further attempts at deleting this article should be made via the proposed deletion process (prod) if uncontroversial, or the article taken to articles for deletion (AfD) for debate on the merits. Note: this template should be removed once the associated article has survived an AfD debate; or has been significantly changed such that further speedy deletion requests are unlikely. |
Contested deletion
editThis article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because apart from being a major development with 2-18 hole golf courses, there is an existing article on the parent company. So at worst, the appropriate course of action would be to merge. Speedy deletion would be unconstructive and unhelpful. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
- Please see WP:INHERITORG. There is no inheritable notability. It must have been discussed thoroughly by secondary sources. Ging287 (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)
- This site ranks the course 4th in Florida, and has a review. All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 00:53, 1 April 2014 (UTC).
The conversations taking place on this page are limited and dated. The last conversations to take place were in 2014 regarding the possibility of deletion because of lack of asserted importance. Those who expressed the desire to keep the page have done so, but have done very little to contribute to the page outside of that. There is no real 'behind the scenes' going on about how to represent this topic, however I would like to change that and establish one. I feel like I may be able to collaborate with the other people who are in this talk section and put some great work into this underdeveloped article to eliminate any thought of deletion or unimportance.Chadm110 (talk) 00:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)