Talk:Streamsong

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Chadm110 in topic Contested deletion

Contested deletion

edit

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because apart from being a major development with 2-18 hole golf courses, there is an existing article on the parent company. So at worst, the appropriate course of action would be to merge. Speedy deletion would be unconstructive and unhelpful. Candleabracadabra (talk) 21:39, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply

Please see WP:INHERITORG. There is no inheritable notability. It must have been discussed thoroughly by secondary sources. Ging287 (talk) 00:58, 1 April 2014 (UTC)Reply


The conversations taking place on this page are limited and dated. The last conversations to take place were in 2014 regarding the possibility of deletion because of lack of asserted importance. Those who expressed the desire to keep the page have done so, but have done very little to contribute to the page outside of that. There is no real 'behind the scenes' going on about how to represent this topic, however I would like to change that and establish one. I feel like I may be able to collaborate with the other people who are in this talk section and put some great work into this underdeveloped article to eliminate any thought of deletion or unimportance.Chadm110 (talk) 00:33, 8 March 2018 (UTC)Reply