Talk:Stranger in a Strange Land (Lost)

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified
Good articleStranger in a Strange Land (Lost) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 15, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Title edit

The title for this episode is very likely a reference to the passage in the Bible that uses the phrase "stranger in a strange land." I can't prove it, but it is a lot more likely than inexplicably referencing a novel about a human from Mars who learns the ways of Earth people. The book's title is itself a reference to the phrase from the Bible. Put on a "citation needed" if you feel you must, but I don't think it needs to be reverted back.--Smooth Nick 05:58, 16 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

I disagree. Two possible analogies to Heinlein's "Michael Valentine Smith" character. One, Jack in Thailand, who arrives in an Asian culture that he is unfamiliar with, but he seems "destined for great things" or "great leadership" though as his tattoo states he is "not one of us".
More tenuous though may be Karl, who raised by "Others" (like Smith), now finds himself in amongst "primitive humans" (Kate, Sawyer, et al).
The book is a cultural artifact, referenced in songs and other media elsewhere. Although the title derives from the Bible, the book is what has made it famous. Lost is big on literary references and comparisons anyway.~ZytheTalk to me! 00:56, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
In Heinlein's book, as in this episode of Lost, we have the main character imprisoned in an alien culture and attended by a female that he is attracted to. Personally, I wouldn't take the analogy farther than the literal meaning of the title, and the article should give reference to BOTH possible sources, the Bible AND Heinlein. We are not here to make decisions on intended meaning, but to provide information. I don't understand why this has to be discussed at all. Just put it all in. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.22.86.94 (talk) 09:51, 13 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Content edit

Is there any particular reason why the entire Summary section has been gutted completely? 138.192.146.45 01:06, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

According to this edit the summary was taken from Lostpedia. Olessi 06:46, 23 February 2007 (UTC)Reply
A synopsys is a synopsys nomater where the source. It's a detail of a sequence of events and would be the same no mater who wrote it. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 72.21.255.17 (talk) 14:31, 23 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Summary. edit

Ok, where is the summary, and why is there an edit war seemingly going on over it? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 60.234.236.149 (talk) 11:34, 23 February 2007 (UTC).Reply

Tattoos edit

Can someone confirm that that is what Jack's tattoos actually say? — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:03, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Never mind, the actual meaning is on Jack's article. — AnemoneProjectors (talk) 11:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Jackstrangerland.jpg edit

 

Image:Jackstrangerland.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 01:30, 7 November 2007 (UTC)Reply

GA Review edit

This review is transcluded from Talk:Stranger in a Strange Land (Lost)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I'll be doing the GA review for this article. Here are some suggestions for improvement.

  • Characters and actors should be linked the first time they appear, so they need to be linked in the lead, if that is their first mention.
  • Mention something about the reception in the lead.
  • Also, I'd mention something about the episode being created around Fox's tattoos.
  • Others is linked twice in the plot.
  • Greatest Hits (Lost), which is a FA, mentions what day it is on the island.
  • How many viewers saw the episode? How does it compare to the previous Lost episode, and how does it compare to other shows that ran at the same time?
  • Image:Strangerstrangelandlost-011.jpg needs a fair use rationale.

A copyedit is also needed, but I'll do that when everything else is taken care of. The article will be on hold for seven days. Nikki311 13:32, 10 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

I struck out all the fixed things, hope you don't mind. I will try to fix the rest of it soon. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 09:13, 11 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
I have fixed most of the raised points. I added some info on Fox's tattoos, is it enough? As for the date on the island, I cannot find it on the net. Even though "Greatest Hits" has it, not all other Lost episodes do. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 12:05, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Great work. I think it is good enough without the date on the island to pass. I'm going to pass the article. Question, though: is the first paragraph in italics because it is a flashback, or is that a typo? Nikki311 16:23, 14 August 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the pass. I did not write the plot section, but I'm pretty sure its because it is a flashback. I am actually going to remove the italics, because other Lost episodes are not like that. Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 06:12, 15 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

POV "known for being one of the worst episodes" edit

Knowledge implies truth, which means being widely known as one of the worst episodes implies that it is one of the worst episodes. That's blatant POV, which isn't supposed to be allowed here. Perhaps it's widely viewed as one of the worst episodes. I haven't seen it yet and thus haven't formed an opinion, but it's certainly an opinion even if it's widely shared. Parableman (talk) 13:36, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

The show's creator has publicy acknowledged this, so I will add some quotation marks and add a citation later. –thedemonhog talkedits 14:49, 22 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page edit

Cyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request it's removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.

Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:

  • http://www.lostpedia.com/wiki/Official_Lost_Podcast_transcript/February_27,_2007
    Triggered by \blostpedia\.com\b on the global blacklist

If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.

From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:35, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 06:06, 12 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:09, 13 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 18:42, 10 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOffline 00:16, 18 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Stranger in a Strange Land (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:53, 20 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Stranger in a Strange Land (Lost). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:00, 19 June 2017 (UTC)Reply