Talk:Still Pending

Untitled

It appears to me that this entry has been the target of some vandalism. The article should not be marked with the spam template. It is written in a neutral voice (please specify where the voice is not neutral if you disagree) and it also meets the notability criteria for bands (see the references added by Xhantar at the bottom of the article. I am also suspicious about the credibility of the user Wikieditor07 - this user has attempted to mark another notable young band Jonas Brothers as spam and did not follow proper procedures for flagging an article for deletion. The user simply deleted all of the article text. Stampsations 06:17, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Despite this editor's actions, please do not criticize his/her credibility. Nobody owns this article. We cannot bite the newcomers; we must assume good faith.--Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?} 17:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. I've posted a message to Wikieditor07's talk page, inviting him to voice any concerns here. Shortly after the article was created, I requested a list of published sources from Still Pending, via email, which they promptly supplied. I then added those to the References section, as far as possible. I will be happy to forward a copy of this mail to any interested parties. The claim that the article contains copyrighted material (as per Wikieditor07's edit summary) is worrying, though. I've asked for more specifics. —Xhantar^Talk 19:57, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

For maintenance reasons, I have moved Still Pending (band) to Still Pending. This is because there are no other articles named "Still Pending", so we can just keep the article the way it is right now. --Ed ^{¿Cómo estás?} 00:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

Copyrighted images

Putting copyrighted images in galleries are not considered fair use. I've put the information in list form, but please feel free to modify it to better fit with the article. –Zytsef 07:29, 3 November 2007 (UTC)

Removed content and sourcing

I have removed a great deal of unsourced or poorly sourced content related to the cartoon network, disney channel, podcasts, you tube and other primary sources or those not meeting reliable sources. To add that information back in, we need sourcing from third-party, objective news sources, preferably national sources. I also removed the three block quotes from the band's formation section since they seemed like major overkill for a short article on a new band. Flowanda | Talk 07:02, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

Let's have a proper discussion of these proposed changes before we simply hack up the article. Thanks PeachWriter66 (talk) 06:12, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

Contentious edits 1July 2010

I have again removed a great deal of poorly sourced edits. Don't revert these edits unless you can defend the content and provide significant mainstream reporting meeting WP:RS, as has been requested in the past. Please note WP:3RR does not apply to the strict sourcing required by WP:BLP. Quoting Wikipedia policy here -- "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". Flowanda | Talk 10:43, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

The Aftermath

I wonder how much of the "Aftermath" paragraph is true? Note nr. [5] doesn't really confirm anything. And what the hell is Susanex exactly? I've never heard about it, and google seems to agree... Once again, "Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced—whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable—should be removed immediately and without waiting for discussion". — Preceding unsigned comment added by 151.77.177.36 (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

It was vandalism. I've removed it. Valfontis (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2015 (UTC)