Talk:Steyr TMP
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
legal to own?
editwas wondering if its legal to own a Steyr TMP in the United States. This would look good in my future collection.(already got alot of swords) Murakumo-Elite (talk) 01:51, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
- Assuming the TMP was only available after 1986, the only way to legally own one is to qualify to own post samples. The SPP is an easy way around this, but its lack of a forward handle might hurt it in the way of looks. --Leif Runenritzer (talk) 22:09, 10 November 2009 (UTC)
Help
editCould someone please correct the format of the MP9 file I uploaded? Please and thank you! Casual Internet Surfer (talk) 19:30, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
Swiss Army missing
editThe USER Swiss Army is missed in this listing. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.197.125.221 (talk) 10:23, 18 November 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Steyr TMP. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20131110055039/http://www.janes.com/security/law_enforcement/news/ipi/ipi0312.shtml to http://www.janes.com/security/law_enforcement/news/ipi/ipi0312.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:39, 14 February 2016 (UTC)