Talk:Stevie Ray Vaughan and Double Trouble
Latest comment: 12 years ago by Chubbles in topic Merge Double Trouble (band) to this article
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Stevie Ray Vaughan and Double Trouble redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Merge Double Trouble (band) to this article edit
Should be a no-brainer. If not, feel free to discuss.RadioKAOS (talk) 17:11, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- I
wrote this article upexpanded the Double Trouble article as a separate unit because the band went on to have a history independently of Vaughan after his death, which is not mentioned in the (brand-new) SRV&DT article. I think rather the new article should be merged here, and its content (which is detailed and impressive) added to this article. Chubbles (talk) 22:18, 7 April 2012 (UTC)- Unless the other article can stand alone to discuss the band without Vaughan (which I doubt it can to such an extent to justify it as a sub-article), this is definitely a case of redundant articles. WP:COMMONNAME would indicate this to be the proper title.RadioKAOS (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- They had a charting album in 2001, well after Vaughan's death; this article doesn't even mention it. Frankly, while this article is detailed and well-sourced, it could itself be merged into the Stevie Ray Vaughan article quite easily, in terms of content. The common name of the band is Double Trouble; I don't really see a WP:COMMONNAME issue there. I certainly don't want to throw out the hard work of the creator of this article, but I think he did his work in the wrong place; I'd be happy to just plop his writeup into the existing article and redirect this one there. Chubbles (talk) 18:00, 8 April 2012 (UTC)
- I went ahead and added the content from this page into the DT article, so it should now include the best of both worlds. Chubbles (talk) 17:13, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
- Unless the other article can stand alone to discuss the band without Vaughan (which I doubt it can to such an extent to justify it as a sub-article), this is definitely a case of redundant articles. WP:COMMONNAME would indicate this to be the proper title.RadioKAOS (talk) 05:34, 8 April 2012 (UTC)