Talk:Stellenbosch Business School

Copyright violation

I believe the following sections contain copyright violations:

• MBA program from [1]
• Course Structure from [2]
• Leadership Development from [3] and [4]
• Masters in Development Finance from [5]
• PhD programme from [6]
• Executive Education from [7]
• Campus from [8]

Purple Duke (talk) 14:32, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Would tend to agree - going to remove the sections, I felt that they wer a bit on the spamy side anyway.Codf1977 (talk) 14:40, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Beat me to it..... Codf1977 (talk) 14:42, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

The items above have been removed and an updated section with references is now available. I would like to remove the copyright queries from the page. Ruben.brandt (talk) 08:44, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Removed as per above Ruben.brandt (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

• I've also removed the History and Timeline sections which weren't behind the {{Copyviocore}} mask but were a blatant copy paste from http://www.usb.ac.za/AboutUs/History.aspx Voceditenore (talk) 15:46, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

May be given the copyright issues and as per Wikipedia:College and university article guidelines this business school does not appear to meet guidelines for its own article perhaps a redirect to Stellenbosch University would be in order. Codf1977 (talk) 15:55, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

A Business School is somewhat separate from the regular University and there are very many individual articles for them. Just look at Category:Business schools in the United States alone. I don't think those Guidelines apply here. Besides, this one is actually quite notable for a variety of reasons, and there would be plenty of independent sources for a decent article. USB (or one of their functionaries) unfortunately took what they thought was the "easy way" to er... raise their internet profile. I'd suggest that the admins leave the opening paragraph as a stub article rather than re-directing. Voceditenore (talk) 16:35, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Notability

I suggest that we remove notability as an issue for this article. The article clearly merits itself as deserving notability becauase it is an academic institution with good repute as far as I can see and is an important part of the university. DiscipleOfKnowledge 14:17, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

I would also recommend we remove notability due to the comments above, and as this university as been selected for the WikiProject South Afica and WikiProject Universities. Ruben.brandt (talk) 09:10, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Removed as per above Ruben.brandt (talk) 17:18, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Requests for assessment

Moved from Wikipedia:WikiProject South Africa/Assessment § Requests for assessment

• University of Stellenbosch Business School Ruben.brandt (talk) 09:36, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

  I have accessed it as start rather than C class due to the following:

  • It should not, but does contain many inline external links, see Wikipedia:ELPOINTS#Important_points_to_remember for the guidelines
  • The External links section if far to large. This normally means that the article is missing important information and External links tries to make up for this.
  • If it has existed since 1964 there should at least be some important people that have attended the school. The article should link to some of them.

  --NJR_ZA (talk) 13:38, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: various official sites, including http://www.ceeman.org/centers.php/20/the-base-of-the-pyramid-learning-lab http://www.usb.ac.za/AboutUs/Futurefund.aspx. Infringing material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:33, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on University of Stellenbosch Business School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100922123809/http://cbn.co.za/index.php?Page=daily to http://www.cbn.co.za/index.php?Page=daily&daily_id=4863
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110927041003/http://www.mbaworld.com/MBAWorld/doShowBusinessSchool.action?editbusinessSchoolId=140 to http://www.mbaworld.com/MBAWorld/doShowBusinessSchool.action?editbusinessSchoolId=140
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130813041519/http://cbn.co.za/dailynews/6617.html to http://www.cbn.co.za/dailynews/6617.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 15:33, 25 February 2016 (UTC)