 | This article was nominated for deletion on 28 January 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
This page should not be speedy deleted because... edit
This page should not be speedily deleted because:
Staub (cookware) is a brand of cookware of similar significance to similar brands that also have pages: Cousances, Le Creuset, Tramontina, Le Chasseur, Lodge, Staub, Descoware.
Other articles:
- http://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2008/04/19/arts-de-la-table-staub-succombe-a-l-offre-de-l-allemand-zwilling_1036194_3234.html?xtmc=staub&xtcr=5
- http://www.nytimes.com/2002/06/19/dining/food-stuff-a-dutch-oven-from-france-turns-a-home-into-a-hearth.html
A simple google book search for "staub cocotte" gives many books that discuss or mention their pots.
I will expand this article later. Earlopogous 20:14, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
Redirect edit
As this stub has little information and has nothing to prove notability I have set a redirect to the parent company that does have the same information in it's article about the purchase of Staub. Mrfrobinson (talk) 16:40, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Mrfrobinson: In my opinion this stub should not be merged with its current parent company which is located in another country. A merge makes it impossible to add pertinent categories such as Category:Manufacturing companies of France and will hinder French wikipedians from adding historical information about this company. XOttawahitech (talk) 23:48, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
- We don't keep stub articles based on what categories can be added rather we keep them on the potential for content. As this was up for CSD and no content has been added except a merger a redirect would be appropriate. Mrfrobinson (talk) 02:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
- @Mrfrobinson: This article is only 3 days old - give it a chance to grow before you bury it. XOttawahitech (talk) 06:29, 28 January 2014 (UTC)
- We don't keep stub articles based on what categories can be added rather we keep them on the potential for content. As this was up for CSD and no content has been added except a merger a redirect would be appropriate. Mrfrobinson (talk) 02:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
Oppose - This article is quite expandable. See the sources added to it. Northamerica1000(talk) 03:22, 1 February 2014 (UTC)
Expanded edit
I have significantly expanded the article, and it remains expandable. NorthAmerica1000 10:03, 27 February 2014 (UTC)
Pronunciation edit
I know that the correct French pronunciation is /stob/ (like English "Stohb") and I would like to at that to this page but I can't find any reputable source online mentioning it that I can use as a citation. Can anyone provide such a thing? Thanks 2WR1 (talk) 23:41, 2 September 2022 (UTC)
- /o/ is the value you expect from au in French so I wouldn't think it constitutes "material likely to be challenged" that you need a source for. Nardog (talk) 01:15, 4 September 2022 (UTC)