| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Starlink article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 90 days  |
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions:
|
 | Page views of this article over the last 90 days:
|
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. | |
Strong technical source
editThis article published on 3 June—before the 4 June launch—has a good deal of information on the constellation, how the orbit raises are done, where the sats are ending up, etc. Will be a good source for improving the article. Evaluating SpaceX’s Starlink Push by Danny Lentz, 3 June 2020.
Why is Starlink in the Space Hazards category?
editThis seems reactionary and exaggerated in the extreme, Starlink might, MIGHT, contribute to the possibility of a space hazard at some point in the undefined future; but categorizing Starlink as a space hazard right now seems premature and possibly a violation of Wiki:crystal ball. Largely Legible Layman (talk) 02:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC)
- I agree. I'm going to go ahead and remove it. Ergzay (talk) 16:13, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
- Notifying both @Yiosie2356 and @Jrdelpino who previously did some minor edit warring on this subject. With Jrdelpino apparently offering this link as evidence.
- I disagree that it presents sufficient evidence that it is an explicit space hazard.
- The only other objects in that category related to man-made objects are satellites that were targets of anti-satellite weapons or sub categories about derelict satellites or space debris. If Starlink is to be described as a space hazard then other low earth orbit satellite constellations should be treated the same. Ergzay (talk) 16:28, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
Starlink Azərbaycanda nə zaman fəaliyyətə başlayacaq?
editStarlink Azərbaycanda nə zaman fəaliyyətə başlayacaq? Tarzan1990 (talk) 11:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
- Translation software produces "When will Starlink start operating in Azerbaijan?": The map claims "starting in 2024" - planned but no specific date yet. --mfb (talk) 11:52, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Starlink set to enter Sri Lanka next
edit"Sri Lanka regulator grants licence to Musk's Starlink for satellite broadband" https://economictimes.indiatimes.com/news/international/world-news/sri-lanka-regulator-grants-licence-to-musks-starlink-for-satellite-broadband/articleshow/112489384.cms NishantXavier (talk) 08:38, 13 August 2024 (UTC)
Starlink user terminals list
editI think a list of all available user terminals, with their technical specifications and hardware capabilities would be very good for the topic, could be either in this article on in a separate one 2800:A4:303:4900:352F:E10A:A3CA:B9B0 (talk) 01:21, 15 August 2024 (UTC)
Starlink Service being extended to Major Airline, United Airlines
editUnited Airlines is moving to Starlink vs GeoStationary based Onboard WIFI Solutions such as ViaSat. Gabriel Stangl (talk) 23:15, 28 September 2024 (UTC)
Logo
edit[1]https://uspto.report/TM/98242270/mark
This is the logo for Starlink that is used at my local Best Buy. Is it correct?
- AAEexecutive (talk) 11:37, 14 October 2024 (UTC)
- This is an interesting question. It does't seem like they are really consistent with branding. If you go to the page for Starlink on Twitter, it uses that logo, but on the Starlink website it varies from that logo to text that says "STARLINK" with the SpaceX logo on top of that. This branding is confusing. Snoowastaken (talk) 17:55, 16 October 2024 (UTC)