Talk:Star Trek (comics)

Fair use rationale for Image:StarTrekComic2001.jpg

Image:StarTrekComic2001.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:32, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Star Trek (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20080313234429/http://rhandley.0catch.com:80/trekstrips/ to http://rhandley.0catch.com/trekstrips
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110605234642/http://store.yahoo.com/omegapp/tokyopop.html to http://store.yahoo.com/omegapp/tokyopop.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 21:54, 18 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Star Trek (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061025235300/http://www.idwpublishing.com/titles/startrek.shtml to http://www.idwpublishing.com/titles/startrek.shtml/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Star Trek (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111029110109/http://www.devilsduedigital.com/titles/startrek.php to http://www.devilsduedigital.com/titles/startrek.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:23, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Proposed merge of Draft:List of Star Trek comics into Star Trek (comics)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

To delete draft rather than to merge; content is redundant to other articles. Klbrain (talk) 05:19, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

---

Draft appears to be longer than this article and may expand it. Robert McClenon (talk) 15:02, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Draft requires more work before any potential merge. Thosbsamsgom (talk) 09:43, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

Could you be more specific about what improvements you think the Draft needs? (Assuming the contents of the contents of the two articles get merged, in addition to that.) Ideally if you could add a short list on the Draft talk:List of Star Trek comics, but if you prefer to reply here I suppose I can always make a copy/checklist over there later. The Draft lists seems about Start class to me, although there aren't references there are ISBN to WP:VERIFY most things.

As I mentioned on the Draft talk page Rdzogschen (talk · contribs) who created the draft seems to have retired and it would be a shame to see the work on the draft go to waste so the Merge suggestion was a great idea. I think the contents of this article should be merged and redirected to the List article rather than the other way round, even a list article should include some explanatory prose. If were going to do some work on the article, my intention would be to add to the long draft list rather than this short article. -- 109.76.205.45 (talk) 01:36, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

I think I'm starting to see the bigger problem, there are lots of different Star Trek Comics articles, with varying amounts of detail and redundancy. -- 109.76.205.45 (talk) 01:59, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

 Comment: I'm leaving notice that I copied the IDW content from Draft:List of Star Trek comics over to Star Trek (IDW Publishing). I first reorganized the content in my sandbox and then updated it (ie. added in missing series, etc). Sariel Xilo (talk) 23:00, 10 February 2022 (UTC)

Given that the useful material already exists elsewhere, content has been copied elsewhere, merging the draft would only worsen the duplication/overlap problem in main space. I hence suggest deleting the draft (redundant). Klbrain (talk) 07:57, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.